Knowledge production and environmental conflict

Knowledge production and environmental conflict

Systematic reviews have become popular for mapping knowledge about environmental impacts. This article provides a commentary on the role of stakeholder involvement when reviewing issues that involve conflicting interests and controversy.

Kløcker Larsen, R. and Nilsson, A.E. (2017) Knowledge production and environmental conflict: Managing systematic reviews and maps for constructive outcomes. Environmental Evidence 6 (7). DOI 10.1186/s13750-017-0095-x

Abstract
Systematic reviews and maps in the environmental field are often carried out in contexts of contestation between different knowledge holders and users, placing demands on the review team to constructively relate to different
interests and perspectives. The aim of this short commentary is to place systematic reviews and maps into a broader perspective of conflict management related to knowledge production, including the role of facilitated stakeholder
involvement. We introduce a brief framework that identifies four dimensions that are relevant for choosing among different approaches to knowledge production in conflict situations: type of conflict, view of knowledge, model of stakeholder
involvement, and measure of quality. We also provide some suggestions on how such a framework can be applied in connection with planning for systematic reviews and maps. Options include managing conflicts through facilitated stakeholder involvement within the review itself as well as a thorough assessment of what specifically the method can contribute in relationship to other approaches to knowledge production for environmental management.

Share